Presentation or cockfighting in Bali, “etic” “emic” Clifford Geertz’s ethnographic account? Why not?

Inquiry merely by Emily: ^{Is Clifford Geertz’s ethnographic account of cockfighting in Bali “etic” or “emic” in its presentation? why?}

This is certainly supposed to be about Is Clifford Geertz’s ethnographic account of cockfighting in Bali “etic” or “emic” in its presentation? why? possibly must have to solve concerns themselves. I really hope this will assist in several ways… to make your own life far better. Thinking supposed to be about Is Clifford Geertz’s ethnographic account of cockfighting in Bali “etic” or “emic” in its presentation? why? is going to be the most efficient at a later date.

Best solution:

Answer by Nelson

It was an etic account. He wrote his paper from on outsider or observer point of view. Had it been written from the point of view of a Balinese involved in cockfighting then it would have been emic.

I hope this helps. Good luck!

Learn good?

Add your ultimate answer in their comments!

Bali

Symbol in Bali

Bali Sanur Beach

Presentation or cockfighting in Bali, “etic” “emic” Clifford Geertz’s ethnographic account? Why not?